Kilpatrick Townsend


Insights: Perspectives Redacting Sensitive But Not Privileged Information: Surveying the Cases For and Against – PART TWO August 20, 2018 Written by Peter Jacobus and James J. Hefferan, Jr. This is Part Two of a series on the perils of redacting non-responsive but sensitive material during pre-trial discovery. In Part One, we focused on cases against non-responsive redactions. In Part Two, we shift to cases allowing non-responsive redactions and provide our conclusory thoughts. To read the full article, click here. Related People Peter Jacobus t 336.607.7329 pjacobus@ktslaw.com James J. Hefferan, Jr. t 336.607.7495 jhefferan@ktslaw.com

Insights: Perspectives

Redacting Sensitive But Not Privileged Information: Surveying the Cases For and Against – PART TWO

August 20, 2018

Written by Peter Jacobus and James J. Hefferan, Jr.

This is Part Two of a series on the perils of redacting non-responsive but sensitive material during pre-trial discovery. In Part One, we focused on cases against non-responsive redactions. In Part Two, we shift to cases allowing non-responsive redactions and provide our conclusory thoughts.

To read the full article, click here.

Related People

Peter Jacobus

t 336.607.7329

pjacobus@ktslaw.com

James J. Hefferan, Jr.

t 336.607.7495

jhefferan@ktslaw.com